Loose Change: Not the way I would have gone

Now this: Word came down yesterday that Dallas Maverick owner and head of Magnolia Pictures Mark Cuban is in talks to distribute the controversial film Loose Change, a slightly different account of the events of Sept. 11th 2001.The film, narrated by Charlie Sheen (me thinks that speaks for itself) suggests that the U.S. government orchestrated the 911 attacks in order to justify the ongoing war in Iraq. Cuban has stated that he does not believe the theory, but that by bringing it to the forefront, it can be exposed and dissected, and ultimately disproven. Cuban has raised a ton of money, and donated a ton of his own as well, to the families of those killed in the attack. That in and of itself doesn't give him a pass on this one, however. I believe that there are other ways to make money, and certainly other ways to generate buzz. The media explosion of the new millenium has given a forum for many alternative viewpoints, and some are just reckless. I'm going to continue to watch and root for the Mavericks, as the film is not titled Loose Change, presented by the Dallas Mavericks. Does Cubes have the right to release the film? Yes. Should he? I say absolutely not. Supposedly we have the right to burn the American flag, but I'm in no hurry to exercise that right. I appreciate what Cuban has done for the franchise, but I don't care for many of the movies he chooses to distribute, and this is one he should have stayed away from. If the claim in the movie is true, then execute every government figure involved, but please get some real evidence, not wild ass conjecture.